Yeah, a new series! On the rationale and ravages of capitalism! Whoo-hoo!
Okay, most of the time it will just be quick hits, highlighting (mostly) where the pointy head of the stick pokes through the socio-economic skin and (sometimes) efforts to break that stick. And every one in a while I’ll try to stitch these bits together in an attempt to make my own sense of where we are and where we’re going.
Yep, there are others out there manifestly more qualified than I am, who’ve made long and deep study of political economy (and who I’ll crib from—with credit!—
when I remember to look as needed), but I want to try to puzzle my way through this by thinking politically, not economically.
That’s some artificial line-drawin’ I’m doing there, I know, but I’m drawing in pencil, so it’s okay.
These two are pretty self-explanatory:
(h/t karoli, Crooks & Liars)
(h/t Paul Constant, The Stranger)
A bit of comment:
Pinsker is apparently an optimist, because he concludes In all likelihood, the cop Facebook is funding will likely exert a positive force on the area, checking in on wayward kids and improving emergency evacuation procedures.
Which is an odd conclusion, given that immediately following this he notes private entities whose objectives diverge from the public’s can apply the law as they see fit. Who does Facebook’s security team pay attention to? Who do they ignore?
And I would add: What of our rights against their actions?
Temporary nation! Whoo-hoo! As a worker-mercenary myself, I can only confirm the delights of livin’ the free labor life—tho’ I must admit that I’m not completely free, union-bound as I am.
*Megan Rose Dickey, How Much Uber Drivers Really Make
Surprise: not as much as promised.
The real reason, tho’, that I picked this one out, is that the phrase “sharing economy” makes my teeth itch.
When Uber and Lyft and Airbnb and TaskRabbit are all grouped into some kind of happy-clappy “sharing economy”—sharing! it’s good! didn’t your mother teach you to share?—what is oh-so-gracefully elided is that these are really examples of the fee-for-service brokerage economy.
Uber, et. al., are brokers: they broker the relationship between provider and client/customer and take a fee for that service.
One the one, capitalist, hand, this isn’t bad: people are getting paid; on the other, socialist, one, these kinds of services demonstrate how far capitalist relations have penetrated and commodified human relations.
Deserving much comment, which I may or may not eventually get around to providing:
Kathleen Geier, Sarah Jaffe and Sheila Bapat, What Do the Recent Supreme Court Decisions Mean for Women’s Economic Security?
Esther Kaplan, Losing Sparta
How to fight back: Together! Solidarity!
He will probably end up losing his home, because the law favors the house.
Still, it’s good to fight back, if only to remind ourselves we can fight back.