Sunny came home with a vengeance

18 01 2024

It was too cold to go out shooting today, so here’s a shot I took about a month ago—inside.

My friend M. has moved back to the city. She and I were tight in high school, in intermittent contact college through grad school and post-doc, and then lost touch after I moved to New York. It was hard for her: she loved New York and had never wanted to leave, so me living here, well, it was hard for her.

(I know this because she told me. She felt bad, but I understood: I missed Montreal so much when I left that any mention of it was painful. Hell, I still miss Montreal.)

But the reason she left was reversed, so she returned, and I am delighted not only to have her back in my life, but to have her living a short subway ride away.

And she wants to do stuff! I mentioned in my last post that I’ve been veering off my work-home path to try to make my life as big as this city, so, even though I am crabby and inertial, her invitations provide some oomph to that desire to go big.

And not just big. M has been taking some courses at Gotham Writers Workshop and become friends with some of the other workshoppers; this in turn has led to her initiating her own writing group, and inviting me to participate.

This, too, is in line with another desire of mine: my heretofore not-at-all-successful attempts to revive my creative writing. We met this past Tuesday (I had only my ears to contribute this time) and decided to keep meeting weekly. I initially balked at the weekly, but thought, Terri, do you actually want to write or do you just want to wish you wrote? It might end up being too much, but what the hell, why not stretch.

So, thanks, M. In getting back your life you’re helping me get back mine.





And if I listen in, I hear my own heart beating

11 01 2024

I’ve mentioned that I had (still have) an Olympus OM-4; I bought it used from a Daily Cardinal friend and once in hand, just started taking pictures.

I’ve been more cautious with the XT-4, and for no good reason. I got the camera because I thought my life had become too small, and I wanted something that had nothing to do with work or politics. I took up ceramics in grad school, and got to the point of “not half-bad”, but the problem with throwing pots is that. . . you end up with a lot of pots. Since I already had some experience with photography (including developing and printing film), I went with that, instead.

Photography also has the advantage of getting me off my ass and out of my apartment—and, importantly, to pay attention to my surroundings. (I still walk and look around, but that’s mostly at night and, honestly, mostly for exercise.) There’s so much to see in this city, and I spend a lot of time not seeing it.

Relatedly, I’ve gotten in the habit of, at least once a week, getting oot and aboot in the city (the shots above and below were from today’s jaunt in downtown Brooklyn and DUMBO). I don’t often take my camera—during the semester I’m getting off the train on my way back from the Bronx, and my backpack is heavy enough without the camera—but I am trying, again, to pay attention.

For example, I was recently in the Met (which is pay-what-you-wish for NYC residents) and zipping through a section on European painting on my way to the American wing when I caught a portrait and thought, Huh, is that, uh, whatshisname? I kept going, then realized that that was, indeed, Rembrandt. I was surrounded by Rembrandts.

For Chrissakes, I snipped at myself, You can’t just zip by Rembrandt.

So I stopped, and turned around, and slowly worked my way around the room. I tend toward 20th century works, but, man, Rembrandt and Vermeer really do it for me. I don’t really have the words and really don’t have the knowledge of art or art history, but I do know when something stands me still. (Oddly, I’ll say that such works ‘move me’, but really, they stop me.) The light, and the shadows. . . I can almost hear these portraits breathe.

I did eventually end up in the American section, only to hurry through it; another time.

One more thing: all of this is a means of trying both to see and see beneath this city, to claim it as mine. I’ve been here coming up on 18 years, and while I’ve spent time in every borough—even Staten Island!—and know a fair amount about the skin of the place, I’ve barely dipped into the blood and the bones.

You gotta hustle to survive this joint; while I haven’t perfected the hustle, I am surviving. That’s not nothing, but, as ever, there must be something more.





Right here, right now

3 01 2024

New year, but no resolutions: I keep saying “I’m gonna do this. . .” and keep not-doing whatever it is.

So I’m just going to try to do, and see what happens.

I have done some things: I’m slowly getting to know my camera. I’m less intimidated by it than I was initially, but there are basic things about my XT4 that I’m still messing up. Some of these errors could be fixed in post-production, but a) that would require me to learn post (I currently have GIMP) and b) I’d really prefer to get the photos right at the source.

And oh ho ho, am I far from getting things right at the source. I’m currently working in manual mode: I bought the camera without a lens, instead buying an adapter for my favorite 23-85mm lens from my old Olympus. I like having the control (even if I’m screwing up) and, honestly, the auto-everything was too much. I am looking at an 18-55mm auto-lens, but, again, I feel like I have to get better with the set-up I have before trying to expand beyond it.

Anyway, far-from-right: I screwed up the ISO for. . . awhile, because I thought the sensitivity tuner was, in fact, the “film” speed. I’d repeatedly nudge the button from single-shot to burst-mode without knowing I’d done it and not know how to fix. (I started carrying the manual with me after the second time this happened.) The XT4 allows me to choose film “type” and I’d choose the wrong one—tho’, to be fair, this is inherently a trial-and-error issue. And I haven’t used the exposure compensation dial at all. At least I could work the f-stops.

I’m also still working on my “eye”. I’m not useless when it comes to framing a shot, but what I can do is pretty basic. And I’ve mostly failed when it comes to getting the contrasts right.

Still, the great advantage of digital is that I can take a lot of shots I suspect will be throwaways without having to worry that I’m wasting film. I appreciate the discipline that film provided when I first started taking pictures, but I also appreciate the freedom to take the same shot with different settings.

So, for example, I took this one in Prospect Park, and it’s. . . fine:

I got the reflection, but the colors of the land and trees was dull. I adjusted the ISO and got this:

It’s a mite dark, but more visually interesting. It captures more of the detail of the trees and leaves, which in turn creates a better contrast to the reflection.

You can see a similar dynamic with the next two shots: one slightly brighter and duller, the other darker and starker:

I prefer the stark.

I won’t bore you with more shitty/less-shitty shots; but let’s end on a not-great one of my kitty, because: kitty!