And Perry looks rather too much like like the previous occupant of the White House in that shot of him standing next to his plane.
He has no chance of winning of course, but I like that he’s pissing away the millions given to him by conservative donors.
As I used to say when working for a left-wing paper and we were criticized for taking money from non- and anti-lefty advertisers: Spend it all—make them spend it all!
Of course there is envy in America, but there’s also spite. And I think you see some of it in Romney’s reply. He has a lot of money, personally. That money is very useful to him in a number of ways. It lets him consume more goods and services. It offers him security against the ups and downs in life. It lets him be assured that his kids will have a leg up in life. But over and above that, Romney seems to revel in the idea of being better than the lower orders of society and resists the leveling impulse even though it would in concrete terms leave him with plenty of money.
I don’t know if he’s spiteful or not, but statements about envy and [the out-of-context] “I like being able to fire people” make it difficult to conclude otherwise.
Narrative, man, narrative! You do not want to feed your weaknesses: it doesn’t turn the weakness into strength, but strengthens the weakness. Tch tch tch.
Anyway, this gives me another chance to pull out a much-used Rousseau quote:
[I]f one sees a handful of powerful and rich men at the height of greatness and fortune while the mob grovels in obscurity and misery, it is because the former prize the things they enjoy only to the extent that the others are deprived of them; and because, without changing their position, they would cease to be happy, if only the people ceased to be miserable.
This is not the impression you want to leave with would-be voters.
AbsurdBeats 